Talk:Loria/@comment-38840163-20190817195538/@comment-82.26.184.149-20190823063842

"Evidence he did not rape anyone" is a logical falicy. You can't prove that easily, especially in the case of a man who lived decades ago. The argument should be for proof he did rape someone.

How are you supposed to disprove something so shrouded in propoganda? The logical reaction should be to doubt it unconditionally until proof it actually happened comes out.